Subject: exactly what can and cannot an earthlight do
From: "Mike Williams" <ozestrange@...>
Date: 14 Apr 2005 07:38
Hi Two quick points. I have the excellent book by Andrew collins. The only problem I see with meditation/photo results is the following. I used to capture the exact same black balls as Collins did when I used to repeat Constable/Bocconnes ired experiments. I would get the "results" whilst eating chocolate/reading/talking about nothing etc. Now if I had meditated and achieved the same "results" could I have claimed that the black things in the air were due to my thougth patterns. The main problem with eartlights is this. Whats the difference between an "earthlight" and just a straight out anomalous light that is often classified<badly> as a ufo. If an "earthlight" can have a structure/shape/pulsating lights/and project light beams/react to the thoughts+movements of the observers etc it then its seems to me that by using the monicker "eartlight" it removes the stigma associated with normal unusual aerial phenomena<ufo>. What does the "earthlight" have to do or display to separate itself from being just a ufo. Because at the moment it sems an "earthlight" can do/be anything the researcher wants it to be. Mike