Subject: Budden's answer to William's answer.
From: "Albert Budden" <buddenemf@...>
Date: 11 Jun 2002 13:03
Well Mr Williams, I see from your so-called answer that you cannot answer a straight question and have concocted a great mixed up splurge of gobbledigook in the hope that it gets you out of anwering my simple and straight-forward questions. Your "answer" is unintelligible and wanders all over the shop. I see now what the simple answer is. You are a genuine Australian idiot! A babbler of the first degree. Someone who has no grasp of what I am talking about in my books. There is really no point trying tocommunicate with you any more. Basically what you don't like is the fact that I have shown that there is a mundane electromagnetic stimulus that drives alien abduction experiences, and you still want to cling onto the idea that real aliens are at work. You still have not answered my questions: What was your methodology used for your field surveys? Never mind what you think I did or not do. What did you do? What do you think that the TriField should do that it does Not? Your answer to this was a good laugh. It was a long stream of babble. What is your conclusion as to the real nature of alien abduction experiences? This was not answered at all. However, I can see now that you are incapable of answering in any intelligble way. I see too that you did not quote the part in Vallee's letter which said (quote) " Frankly, I was stunned at the elegance of your approach and somewhat peeved that I had not thought of it myself" (from personal letter from Dr Jacques Vallee. Funny that. How you did not mention it I mean. Williams- you are a fool of the first degree. Albert Budden. _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com