Subject: Re: I'm interested in learning more
From: Frits Westra <fwestra@...>
Date: 12 Feb 2002 13:30
Hello Barb, I've read your message with great interest. It seems to me that we can learn a lot from you! On 11th February 2002, Barbara Huyser <barb@...> wrote: --[snip]--- >I have found anomalous electromagnetic fields in these >locations. Using an electromagnetic field detector, I have >been able to draw out the shape of the field, which is almost >always spherical. I'm curious which field detector you use to draw out the shape of a field. Have you found out whether these were naturally or artificially generated fields? >These fields are also associated with cold >spots. My theory is that I am capturing a spherically shaped >electromagnetic field. The reason it shows up in the photo >is the negative ions shooting out of the field cause the drop >in temperature, resulting in some condensation of the >moisture within the field. This condensation provides a >reflective surface that allows the flash to strike a surface >and reflect it back into the lense of the camera. All of >this occurs too fast for the human eye to perceive it as a >discrete event. This is an interesting new theory. My first question would be: Is there an actual temperature drop in cold spots? I believe that anomaly researcher Albert Budden has also mentioned cold spots somewhere in one of his books (I'm trying to find where), however, from the top off my head, I think he regards it as "sensations of cold", subjective sensations that some people get when they're exposed to (intense) EM fields. He also mentions tingling feelings. >I am familiar with the "spook lights" phenomenon, >particularly as relates to the Joplin Spooklights near Joplin >Missouri. I believe that the vast majority of the spook >lights phenomenon are natural rather than paranormal. I've never heard of the Joplin Spooklights. Could you tell something about it? Thank you for taking the trouble! Best wishes, Frits Westra -- fwestra@...