From hach75@... Fri Jul 23 09:37:22 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: Hach75@... X-Apparently-To: mysterylights@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 5105 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2004 16:37:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m22.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 23 Jul 2004 16:37:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d05.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.37) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Jul 2004 16:37:22 -0000 Received: from Hach75@... by imo-d05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r2.6.) id r.24.5bc15107 (3956) for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 12:35:56 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <24.5bc15107.2e32986c@...> Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 12:35:56 EDT To: mysterylights@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5000 X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 205.188.157.37 From: hach75@... Subject: Re: [mysterylights] New Instrument Data and Report from Hessdalen... X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=169843203 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi The topic remains, " concern for aviation safety". The lack of sightings by pilots of unsual objects during the coming decades should not be misconstrued as a manisfestation of an unsual nature but provide comfort considering the past history of sightings. Recent numbers speak for themselves, there are signs of maturity in aviation safety. You mentioned that there were a host of science guys studying sprites/blue jets and related lightning phenomena, rest assure, this is not a labor in vain. In the same manner that you couple a train, you hook up the plasma with a magnetic field. It would be unsual if anybody were to ask "where did the ufo's go?" Don't ask. Joe [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]