From josee.chelkoff@... Fri Mar 08 22:44:29 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: josee.chelkoff@... X-Apparently-To: mysterylights@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: unknown); 9 Mar 2002 06:44:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 84189 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2002 06:44:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172) by m4.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 9 Mar 2002 06:44:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mel-rto7.wanadoo.fr) (193.252.19.26) by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Mar 2002 06:44:27 -0000 Received: from mel-rta3.wanadoo.fr (193.252.19.153) by mel-rto7.wanadoo.fr; 9 Mar 2002 07:44:27 +0100 Received: from portege (193.250.48.53) by mel-rta3.wanadoo.fr; 9 Mar 2002 07:44:23 +0100 Message-ID: <004401c1c735$a2c99ac0$ce79fea9@portege> To: References: Subject: Re: [mysterylights] Re: light balls Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 07:08:32 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 From: "josee chelkoff" X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=28135851 Hello ! Before asserting that a ball light is 'unexplainable' we must make sure that IT really is unexplainable and take all kinds of measurements. For example, as I mentionned it already, we measured the speed of the light ball in our video : (300 G). This is not an "explanation" but a "description" of the phenomenon that has to be as accurate as possible before making it available on the net. And as far as I know, a speed of 300G can hardly be explained in such instance within our scientific knowledge ! Josée ----- Original Message ----- From: ozestrange To: Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 9:54 PM Subject: [mysterylights] Re: light balls > Hi > > I have no idea what you are talking about.! > Anomalous Light Phenomena = ALP > Anomalous = all the lights are not explainable according to those > that are viewing/recording the phenomena. > Its interesting, that people who are not there,who do not not study > the data etc ,"believe" the lights are "explainable". > Nor, do they fit in with conventional physics. > Lights=The phenomena is often seen as lights,viewed at night > Phenomena = Events/lights occur, ergo... > Studies = the lights are studied. > You missed my questions. ;) > > Mike > > > > --- In mysterylights@y..., "E.Erkmen" wrote: > > this not a ALP studies > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > mysterylights-unsubscribe@egroups.com > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >