From ozestrange@... Thu Dec 06 22:54:30 2001
Return-Path: <ozestrange@...>
X-Sender: ozestrange@...
X-Apparently-To: mysterylights@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_2); 7 Dec 2001 06:54:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 99731 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2001 06:54:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172)
  by m6.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 7 Dec 2001 06:54:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n10.groups.yahoo.com) (216.115.96.60)
  by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Dec 2001 06:54:30 -0000
Received: from [216.115.96.178] by n10.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Dec 2001 06:54:29 -0000
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 06:54:26 -0000
To: mysterylights@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Albert Budden
Message-ID: <9upp32+f14s@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <200112061319.OAA09807@...>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 1700
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
From: "ozestrange" <ozestrange@...>
X-Originating-IP: 203.109.250.99
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=61845547
X-Yahoo-Profile: ozestrange
    
Hey Frits

Thanks,I appreciate it. !

Mike


> I happened to receive a telephone call from Albert Budden
> himself today and I told him about your critisism, which seems
> to boil down to below points. Budden would like to react to
> relevant remarks of yours. I'll forward below list to him. I've
> added a new numbering and removed personal remarks of yours that
> I deemed irrelevant and also one that was a misrepresentation
> of my views.
> 
> This procedure may take a while, since Budden will send his
> reply to me by snail-mail. I'll then forward it to this list.
> 
> Cheers,
> Frits
> 
> On 5th December 2001, "Mike Williams" <ozestrange@h...> wrote:
> 
>   >1/The TriField device he uses is a toy.
> 
>   >2/No one else has ever found the consistent readings he seems to 
>   >find everywhere. If there exists someone please tell me.
> 
>   >3/I have found very few readings of interest since i I have 
owned 
>   >the device.And I want to find odd readings as well, to try and 
>   >establish a clear causative link.
> 
>   >4/Budden seems to believe his hypothesis covers ALL paranormal 
>   >claims.But his parameters are to large. They have to be 
falsifiable, 
>   >ie Popper/Kuhn.
> 
>   >5/Please tell me a black and white way of proving/testing etc 
>   >whether Buddens ideas are applicable in ALL cases.And how to 
falsify 
>   >the idea/hypothesis.Because if you cannot falsify it/then it 
isnt a 
>   >theory worth anything.
> 
>   >6/Budden implies that ALL paranormal events are.. 
>   >mag change=neurological change=paranormal claims.
>   >A more realistic belief might be..
>   >Some paranormal events may cause field changes=neurological 
>   >change=paranormal claims.